WhiteHawk Minerals Corp cash flow to debt ratio of 5.79% indicates that the company cannot generate enough cash to cover its debt over time. This level indicates weak financial health.

WhiteHawk Minerals Corp's free cash flow has decreased 385.87% from $-20.95M last year to $-101.77M, signaling decreasing performance

WhiteHawk Minerals Corp's debt to equity ratio is 0.29, which means that the company's assets are healthy financed, signaling financial stability.

WhiteHawk Minerals Corp's debt has decreased relative to shareholder equity from 0.89 last year to 0.29 today, signaling strengthened financials

WhiteHawk Minerals Corp has a net debt to EBITDA ratio of 27.46x, which exceeds the 3.00x threshold, indicating high leverage and potential financial risk

WhiteHawk Minerals Corp's interest coverage ratio is -1.98, which means that the company struggles to meet interest obligations, signaling financial risk.

WhiteHawk Minerals Corp's profit margin has decreased (20.87%) in the last year from -83.36% to -100.76%, signaling decreasing performance

WhiteHawk Minerals Corp's short-term assets of $45.92M exceed its short-term liabilities of $16.30M

WhiteHawk Minerals Corp's return on assets of 0.00% is lower than the 5.00% threshold, indicating inefficient asset utilization

WhiteHawk Minerals Corp's return on equity of -10.32%, is lower than 15.00%, indicating bad performance

WhiteHawk Minerals Corp's operating cash flow is lower than its net income, indicating that earnings may not be fully backed by cash generation

WhiteHawk Minerals Corp has insufficient public price history to evaluate earnings stability.

WhiteHawk Minerals Corp has negative free cash flow, indicating the company is burning cash rather than generating it

WhiteHawk Minerals Corp has negative free cash flow, indicating cash burn

WhiteHawk Minerals Corp's yearly earnings has decreased 132.90% since last year from $-11.56M to $-26.93M, signaling decreasing performance

WhiteHawk Minerals Corp's yearly revenue has increased 427.70% since last year from $13.87M to $73.18M, signaling increasing performance

ROIC -2.38% (Source: FMP key-metrics). Below the 5% partial-credit threshold. Score: 0 of 2. The 5% and 10% cutoffs anchor to typical US weighted-average cost of capital. Below 5% indicates the company is not generating returns above its likely cost of capital under this definition of invested capital. Invested capital here includes equity, non-current liabilities (pension obligations, deferred taxes, lease obligations), and short-term debt. Cash is not subtracted. Companies with substantial float, lease portfolios, or cash holdings will score lower under this definition than under narrower operating-capital definitions. See methodology.

WhiteHawk Minerals Corp has insufficient revenue history to calculate 3-year revenue CAGR.

WhiteHawk Minerals Corp has insufficient public price history to evaluate revenue consistency.

WhiteHawk Minerals Corp has insufficient public price history to evaluate ROE consistency.

WhiteHawk Minerals Corp has insufficient data to evaluate this check.

WhiteHawk Minerals Corp has negative trailing-twelve-month earnings; this ratio is not meaningful and the check fails

WhiteHawk Minerals Corp is overvalued relative to its fair value price of 0.00 based on EBITDA multiple model

WhiteHawk Minerals Corp has an EV/EBITDA ratio of 107.38x, which exceeds the 20.00x threshold, indicating the stock may be overvalued relative to its operating earnings

WhiteHawk Minerals Corp has insufficient data to evaluate this check.

WhiteHawk Minerals Corp has negative trailing-twelve-month earnings; this ratio is not meaningful and the check fails

WhiteHawk Minerals Corp has a price-to-book ratio of 1.32x, which is below the 5.00x threshold, indicating reasonable valuation relative to its book value

WhiteHawk Minerals Corp has a price-to-sales ratio of 16.49x, which exceeds the 8.00x threshold, indicating the stock may be overvalued relative to its revenue