Mercury Systems, Inc. balance-sheet data unavailable; cash-flow debt coverage cannot be computed.

Mercury Systems, Inc.'s free cash flow has increased 16.63% from $119.05M last year to $138.85M, signaling increasing performance

Mercury Systems, Inc.'s debt to equity ratio is 0.44, which means that the company's assets are healthy financed, signaling financial stability.

Mercury Systems, Inc.'s debt has decreased relative to shareholder equity from 0.44 last year to 0.44 today, signaling strengthened financials

Mercury Systems, Inc. has a net debt to EBITDA ratio of 9.96x, which exceeds the 3.00x threshold, indicating high leverage and potential financial risk

Mercury Systems, Inc.'s interest coverage ratio is 0.37, which means that the company struggles to meet interest obligations, signaling financial risk.

Mercury Systems, Inc.'s profit margin has increased (-91.15%) in the last year from -16.48% to -1.46%, signaling increasing performance

Mercury Systems, Inc.'s short-term liabilities of $300.38M exceed its short-term assets of $9.29M, signaling financial risk

Mercury Systems, Inc.'s return on assets of 0.00% is lower than the 5.00% threshold, indicating inefficient asset utilization

Mercury Systems, Inc.'s return on equity of -0.96%, is lower than 15.00%, indicating bad performance

Mercury Systems, Inc.'s operating cash flow is lower than its net income, indicating that earnings may not be fully backed by cash generation

Mercury Systems, Inc. had positive net income in only 1 out of 5 years, indicating unstable earnings

Mercury Systems, Inc. has positive free cash flow, indicating the company generates cash after capital expenditures

Mercury Systems, Inc. has a free cash flow yield of 2.13%, which is above the 2.00% threshold, indicating strong cash generation relative to market value

Mercury Systems, Inc.'s yearly earnings has increased -72.46% since last year from $-137.64M to $-37.90M, signaling increasing performance

Mercury Systems, Inc.'s yearly revenue has increased 9.19% since last year from $835.27M to $912.02M, signaling increasing performance

ROIC 0.43% (Source: FMP key-metrics). Below the 5% partial-credit threshold. Score: 0 of 2. The 5% and 10% cutoffs anchor to typical US weighted-average cost of capital. Below 5% indicates the company is not generating returns above its likely cost of capital under this definition of invested capital. Invested capital here includes equity, non-current liabilities (pension obligations, deferred taxes, lease obligations), and short-term debt. Cash is not subtracted. Companies with substantial float, lease portfolios, or cash holdings will score lower under this definition than under narrower operating-capital definitions. See methodology.

Mercury Systems, Inc.'s 3-year revenue CAGR of -2.16% is negative, indicating declining revenue over the past 3 years

Mercury Systems, Inc. had revenue growth in 4 out of 5 years, indicating consistent revenue performance

Mercury Systems, Inc. had positive ROE in only 1 out of 5 years, indicating inconsistent returns on equity

Mercury Systems, Inc. is overvalued relative to its fair value price of 30.28 based on Discounted Cash Flow model

Mercury Systems, Inc. has negative trailing-twelve-month earnings; this ratio is not meaningful and the check fails

Mercury Systems, Inc. is overvalued relative to its fair value price of 0.00 based on EBITDA multiple model

Mercury Systems, Inc. has an EV/EBITDA ratio of 110.27x, which exceeds the 20.00x threshold, indicating the stock may be overvalued relative to its operating earnings

Mercury Systems, Inc. is overvalued relative to its fair value price of -3.82 based on Earnings Fair Value model

Mercury Systems, Inc. has negative trailing-twelve-month earnings; this ratio is not meaningful and the check fails

Mercury Systems, Inc. has a price-to-book ratio of 4.37x, which is below the 5.00x threshold, indicating reasonable valuation relative to its book value

Mercury Systems, Inc. has a price-to-sales ratio of 6.67x, which is below the 8.00x threshold, indicating reasonable valuation relative to its revenue