Martin Midstream Partners L.P. cash flow to debt ratio of 8.79% indicates that the company cannot generate enough cash to cover its debt over time. This level indicates weak financial health.

Martin Midstream Partners L.P.'s free cash flow has increased 236.72% from $6.34M last year to $21.36M, signaling increasing performance

Martin Midstream Partners L.P.'s debt to equity ratio is -5.48, signaling that the company spent its equity and risk bankruptcy.

Martin Midstream Partners L.P.'s debt to equity ratio is -5.48, signaling that the company spent its equity and risk bankruptcy.

Martin Midstream Partners L.P. has a net debt to EBITDA ratio of 5.35x, which exceeds the 3.00x threshold, indicating high leverage and potential financial risk

Martin Midstream Partners L.P.'s interest coverage ratio of 48.71 indicates that earnings with good margin can cover interest payments on company debt

Martin Midstream Partners L.P.'s profit margin has decreased (106.81%) in the last year from -0.72% to -1.48%, signaling decreasing performance

Martin Midstream Partners L.P.'s short-term assets of $129.91M exceed its short-term liabilities of $124.14M

Martin Midstream Partners L.P.'s return on assets of 0.00% is lower than the 5.00% threshold, indicating inefficient asset utilization

Martin Midstream Partners L.P.'s return on equity of 12.49%, is lower than 15.00%, indicating bad performance

Martin Midstream Partners L.P.'s operating cash flow is lower than its net income, indicating that earnings may not be fully backed by cash generation

Martin Midstream Partners L.P. had positive net income in only 0 out of 5 years, indicating unstable earnings

Martin Midstream Partners L.P. has positive free cash flow, indicating the company generates cash after capital expenditures

Martin Midstream Partners L.P. has a free cash flow yield of 21.84%, which is above the 2.00% threshold, indicating strong cash generation relative to market value

Martin Midstream Partners L.P.'s yearly earnings has decreased 184.56% since last year from $-5.08M to $-14.45M, signaling decreasing performance

Martin Midstream Partners L.P.'s yearly revenue has increased 1.20% since last year from $707.62M to $716.11M, signaling increasing performance

ROIC 7.22% (Source: FMP key-metrics). In the 5–10% partial-credit band. Score: 1 of 2. This band sits within the typical US weighted-average cost of capital range. Methodology choice can change the conclusion: under FMP's invested-capital definition the company is at or near its cost of capital; under narrower operating-capital definitions the same company may score higher. Invested capital here includes equity, non-current liabilities, and short-term debt. Cash is not subtracted. See methodology.

Martin Midstream Partners L.P.'s 3-year revenue CAGR of -11.09% is negative, indicating declining revenue over the past 3 years

Martin Midstream Partners L.P. had revenue growth in 3 out of 5 years, indicating consistent revenue performance

Martin Midstream Partners L.P. had positive ROE in only 0 out of 5 years, indicating inconsistent returns on equity

Martin Midstream Partners L.P. has insufficient data to evaluate this check.

Martin Midstream Partners L.P. has negative trailing-twelve-month earnings; this ratio is not meaningful and the check fails

Martin Midstream Partners L.P. is undervalued relative to its fair value price of 4.14 based on EBITDA multiple model

Martin Midstream Partners L.P. has an EV/EBITDA ratio of 6.35x, which is below the 20.00x threshold, indicating reasonable valuation relative to its operating earnings

Martin Midstream Partners L.P. is undervalued relative to its fair value price of 12.11 based on Earnings Fair Value model

Martin Midstream Partners L.P. has negative trailing-twelve-month earnings; this ratio is not meaningful and the check fails

Martin Midstream Partners L.P. has negative shareholder equity; price-to-book is not meaningful and the check fails

Martin Midstream Partners L.P. has a price-to-sales ratio of 0.13x, which is below the 8.00x threshold, indicating reasonable valuation relative to its revenue