Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc. cash flow to debt ratio of 2.60% indicates that the company cannot generate enough cash to cover its debt over time. This level indicates weak financial health.

Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc.'s free cash flow has increased -66.43% from $-930.48M last year to $-312.35M, signaling increasing performance

Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc.'s debt to equity ratio is 1.49, which means that the company's assets are unhealthy financed, signaling financial risk.

Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc.'s debt has increased relative to shareholder equity from 0.60 last year to 1.49 today, signaling weakened financials

Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc. has negative EBITDA, making leverage ratio unreliable

Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc. earns at least as much interest as it pays. Interest obligations are fully covered.

Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc.'s profit margin has decreased (621.11%) in the last year from 82.46% to -429.71%, signaling decreasing performance

Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc.'s short-term assets of $664.27M exceed its short-term liabilities of $521.88M

Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc.'s return on assets of 0.00% is lower than the 5.00% threshold, indicating inefficient asset utilization

Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc.'s return on equity of -110.39%, is lower than 15.00%, indicating bad performance

Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc.'s operating cash flow is lower than its net income, indicating that earnings may not be fully backed by cash generation

Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc. had positive net income in only 2 out of 5 years, indicating unstable earnings

Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc. has negative free cash flow, indicating the company is burning cash rather than generating it

Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc. has negative free cash flow, indicating cash burn

Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc.'s yearly earnings has decreased 342.30% since last year from $541.25M to $-1.31B, signaling decreasing performance

Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc.'s yearly revenue has increased 38.20% since last year from $656.38M to $907.09M, signaling increasing performance

ROIC -17.60% (Source: FMP key-metrics). Below the 5% partial-credit threshold. Score: 0 of 2. The 5% and 10% cutoffs anchor to typical US weighted-average cost of capital. Below 5% indicates the company is not generating returns above its likely cost of capital under this definition of invested capital. Invested capital here includes equity, non-current liabilities (pension obligations, deferred taxes, lease obligations), and short-term debt. Cash is not subtracted. Companies with substantial float, lease portfolios, or cash holdings will score lower under this definition than under narrower operating-capital definitions. See methodology.

Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc.'s 3-year revenue CAGR of 97.50% is positive, indicating growing revenue over the past 3 years

Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc. had revenue growth in 4 out of 5 years, indicating consistent revenue performance

Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc. had positive ROE in only 2 out of 5 years, indicating inconsistent returns on equity

Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc. has insufficient data to evaluate this check.

Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc. has negative trailing-twelve-month earnings; this ratio is not meaningful and the check fails

Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc. is overvalued relative to its fair value price of 0.00 based on EBITDA multiple model

Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc. has negative or missing EBITDA, making EV/EBITDA ratio unreliable

Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc. is overvalued relative to its fair value price of -17.89 based on Earnings Fair Value model

Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc. has negative trailing-twelve-month earnings; this ratio is not meaningful and the check fails

Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc. has a price-to-book ratio of 2.07x, which is below the 5.00x threshold, indicating reasonable valuation relative to its book value

Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc. has a price-to-sales ratio of 4.54x, which is below the 8.00x threshold, indicating reasonable valuation relative to its revenue