Caesarstone Ltd. cash flow to debt ratio of -26.49% indicates that the company cannot generate enough cash to cover its debt over time. This level indicates weak financial health.

Caesarstone Ltd.'s free cash flow has decreased 310.25% from $21.45M last year to $-45.11M, signaling decreasing performance

Caesarstone Ltd.'s debt to equity ratio is 0.89, which means that the company's assets are unhealthy financed, signaling financial risk.

Caesarstone Ltd.'s debt has increased relative to shareholder equity from 0.49 last year to 0.89 today, signaling weakened financials

Caesarstone Ltd. has negative EBITDA, making leverage ratio unreliable

Caesarstone Ltd. earns at least as much interest as it pays. Interest obligations are fully covered.

Caesarstone Ltd.'s profit margin has decreased (286.75%) in the last year from -9.66% to -37.38%, signaling decreasing performance

Caesarstone Ltd.'s short-term assets of $253.09M exceed its short-term liabilities of $138.17M

Caesarstone Ltd.'s return on assets of 0.00% is lower than the 5.00% threshold, indicating inefficient asset utilization

Caesarstone Ltd.'s return on equity of -94.47%, is lower than 15.00%, indicating bad performance

Caesarstone Ltd.'s operating cash flow is lower than its net income, indicating that earnings may not be fully backed by cash generation

Caesarstone Ltd. had positive net income in only 1 out of 5 years, indicating unstable earnings

Caesarstone Ltd. has negative free cash flow, indicating the company is burning cash rather than generating it

Caesarstone Ltd. has negative free cash flow, indicating cash burn

Caesarstone Ltd.'s yearly earnings has decreased 220.94% since last year from $-42.83M to $-137.47M, signaling decreasing performance

Caesarstone Ltd.'s yearly revenue has decreased 10.38% since last year from $443.22M to $397.23M, signaling decreasing performance

ROIC -23.38% (Source: FMP key-metrics). Below the 5% partial-credit threshold. Score: 0 of 2. The 5% and 10% cutoffs anchor to typical US weighted-average cost of capital. Below 5% indicates the company is not generating returns above its likely cost of capital under this definition of invested capital. Invested capital here includes equity, non-current liabilities (pension obligations, deferred taxes, lease obligations), and short-term debt. Cash is not subtracted. Companies with substantial float, lease portfolios, or cash holdings will score lower under this definition than under narrower operating-capital definitions. See methodology.

Caesarstone Ltd.'s 3-year revenue CAGR of -16.84% is negative, indicating declining revenue over the past 3 years

Caesarstone Ltd. had revenue growth in only 2 out of 5 years, indicating inconsistent revenue performance

Caesarstone Ltd. had positive ROE in only 1 out of 5 years, indicating inconsistent returns on equity

Caesarstone Ltd. has insufficient data to evaluate this check.

Caesarstone Ltd. has negative trailing-twelve-month earnings; this ratio is not meaningful and the check fails

Caesarstone Ltd. is overvalued relative to its fair value price of 0.00 based on EBITDA multiple model

Caesarstone Ltd. has negative or missing EBITDA, making EV/EBITDA ratio unreliable

Caesarstone Ltd. is overvalued relative to its fair value price of -7.29 based on Earnings Fair Value model

Caesarstone Ltd. has negative trailing-twelve-month earnings; this ratio is not meaningful and the check fails

Caesarstone Ltd. has a price-to-book ratio of 0.86x, which is below the 5.00x threshold, indicating reasonable valuation relative to its book value

Caesarstone Ltd. has a price-to-sales ratio of 0.23x, which is below the 8.00x threshold, indicating reasonable valuation relative to its revenue