Armstrong World Industries, Inc. cash flow to debt ratio of 66.85% indicates that the company generates enough cash to cover a substantial portion of its debt. This level indicates very strong financial health.

Armstrong World Industries, Inc.'s free cash flow has increased 33.75% from $184.00M last year to $246.10M, signaling increasing performance

Armstrong World Industries, Inc.'s debt to equity ratio is 0.66, which means that the company's assets are unhealthy financed, signaling financial risk.

Armstrong World Industries, Inc.'s debt has decreased relative to shareholder equity from 0.79 last year to 0.66 today, signaling strengthened financials

Armstrong World Industries, Inc. has a net debt to EBITDA ratio of 0.76x, which is below the 3.00x threshold, indicating healthy leverage and financial stability

Armstrong World Industries, Inc.'s interest coverage ratio of 15.78 indicates that earnings with good margin can cover interest payments on company debt

Armstrong World Industries, Inc.'s profit margin has increased (1.50%) in the last year from 18.32% to 18.60%, signaling increasing performance

Armstrong World Industries, Inc.'s short-term assets of $391.50M exceed its short-term liabilities of $267.40M

Armstrong World Industries, Inc.'s return on assets of 15.71% is higher than the 5.00% threshold, indicating efficient asset utilization

Armstrong World Industries, Inc.'s return on equity of 35.36%, is higher than 15.00%, indicating good performance

Armstrong World Industries, Inc.'s operating cash flow exceeds its net income, indicating high-quality earnings backed by actual cash generation

Armstrong World Industries, Inc. had positive net income in 5 out of 5 years, indicating stable and consistent earnings

Armstrong World Industries, Inc. has positive free cash flow, indicating the company generates cash after capital expenditures

Armstrong World Industries, Inc. has a free cash flow yield of 3.18%, which is above the 2.00% threshold, indicating strong cash generation relative to market value

Armstrong World Industries, Inc.'s yearly earnings has increased 16.53% since last year from $264.90M to $308.70M, signaling increasing performance

Armstrong World Industries, Inc.'s yearly revenue has increased 12.11% since last year from $1.45B to $1.62B, signaling increasing performance

ROIC 21.73% (Source: FMP key-metrics). At or above the 10% threshold. Score: 2 of 2. The company is generating returns above the upper end of the typical US weighted-average cost of capital range under this definition of invested capital.

Armstrong World Industries, Inc.'s 3-year revenue CAGR of 9.54% is positive, indicating growing revenue over the past 3 years

Armstrong World Industries, Inc. had revenue growth in 5 out of 5 years, indicating consistent revenue performance

Armstrong World Industries, Inc. had positive ROE in 5 out of 5 years, indicating consistent and reliable returns on equity

Armstrong World Industries, Inc. is overvalued relative to its fair value price of 85.74 based on Discounted Cash Flow model

Armstrong World Industries, Inc. has an earnings yield of 4.05%, which is above the 4.00% threshold, indicating the stock offers reasonable value relative to its earnings

Armstrong World Industries, Inc. is overvalued relative to its fair value price of 60.62 based on EBITDA multiple model

Armstrong World Industries, Inc. has an EV/EBITDA ratio of 14.75x, which is below the 20.00x threshold, indicating reasonable valuation relative to its operating earnings

Armstrong World Industries, Inc. is overvalued relative to its fair value price of 115.27 based on Earnings Fair Value model

Armstrong World Industries, Inc. had non-positive diluted EPS five years ago; the PEG ratio is not meaningful and the check fails.

Armstrong World Industries, Inc. has a price-to-book ratio of 8.81x, which exceeds the 5.00x threshold, indicating the stock may be overvalued relative to its book value

Armstrong World Industries, Inc. has a price-to-sales ratio of 4.60x, which is below the 8.00x threshold, indicating reasonable valuation relative to its revenue