a.k.a. Brands Holding Corp. cash flow to debt ratio of 7.76% indicates that the company cannot generate enough cash to cover its debt over time. This level indicates weak financial health.

a.k.a. Brands Holding Corp.'s free cash flow has increased -94.20% from $-10.92M last year to $-633.00K, signaling increasing performance

a.k.a. Brands Holding Corp.'s debt to equity ratio is 2.26, which means that the company's assets are unhealthy financed, signaling financial risk.

a.k.a. Brands Holding Corp.'s debt has increased relative to shareholder equity from 1.56 last year to 2.26 today, signaling weakened financials

a.k.a. Brands Holding Corp. has negative EBITDA, making leverage ratio unreliable

a.k.a. Brands Holding Corp.'s interest coverage ratio is -1.64, which means that the company struggles to meet interest obligations, signaling financial risk.

a.k.a. Brands Holding Corp.'s profit margin has increased (-1.99%) in the last year from -4.52% to -4.43%, signaling increasing performance

a.k.a. Brands Holding Corp.'s short-term assets of $129.47M exceed its short-term liabilities of $105.05M

a.k.a. Brands Holding Corp.'s return on assets of 0.00% is lower than the 5.00% threshold, indicating inefficient asset utilization

a.k.a. Brands Holding Corp.'s return on equity of -26.90%, is lower than 15.00%, indicating bad performance

a.k.a. Brands Holding Corp.'s operating cash flow is lower than its net income, indicating that earnings may not be fully backed by cash generation

a.k.a. Brands Holding Corp. has insufficient public price history to evaluate earnings stability.

a.k.a. Brands Holding Corp. has negative free cash flow, indicating the company is burning cash rather than generating it

a.k.a. Brands Holding Corp. has negative free cash flow, indicating cash burn

a.k.a. Brands Holding Corp.'s yearly earnings has decreased 20.95% since last year from $-25.99M to $-31.43M, signaling decreasing performance

a.k.a. Brands Holding Corp.'s yearly revenue has increased 4.44% since last year from $574.70M to $600.21M, signaling increasing performance

ROIC -4.81% (Source: FMP key-metrics). Below the 5% partial-credit threshold. Score: 0 of 2. The 5% and 10% cutoffs anchor to typical US weighted-average cost of capital. Below 5% indicates the company is not generating returns above its likely cost of capital under this definition of invested capital. Invested capital here includes equity, non-current liabilities (pension obligations, deferred taxes, lease obligations), and short-term debt. Cash is not subtracted. Companies with substantial float, lease portfolios, or cash holdings will score lower under this definition than under narrower operating-capital definitions. See methodology.

a.k.a. Brands Holding Corp.'s 3-year revenue CAGR of -0.63% is negative, indicating declining revenue over the past 3 years

a.k.a. Brands Holding Corp. had revenue growth in 4 out of 5 years, indicating consistent revenue performance

a.k.a. Brands Holding Corp. has insufficient public price history to evaluate ROE consistency.

a.k.a. Brands Holding Corp. has insufficient data to evaluate this check.

a.k.a. Brands Holding Corp. has negative trailing-twelve-month earnings; this ratio is not meaningful and the check fails

a.k.a. Brands Holding Corp. is overvalued relative to its fair value price of 0.00 based on EBITDA multiple model

a.k.a. Brands Holding Corp. has negative or missing EBITDA, making EV/EBITDA ratio unreliable

a.k.a. Brands Holding Corp. has insufficient data to evaluate this check.

a.k.a. Brands Holding Corp. has negative trailing-twelve-month earnings; this ratio is not meaningful and the check fails

a.k.a. Brands Holding Corp. has a price-to-book ratio of 1.27x, which is below the 5.00x threshold, indicating reasonable valuation relative to its book value

a.k.a. Brands Holding Corp. has a price-to-sales ratio of 0.20x, which is below the 8.00x threshold, indicating reasonable valuation relative to its revenue